Keywords: Holography; de Sitter; M-theory; string theory; field with one element (đ˝â); Îť-rings; golden ratio; moduli spaces; formal verification.
Holography and the Riemann hypothesis are missing the same kind of object. The pair correlation of the zeros of follows GUE statistics; so does the boundary side of low-dimensional holography, where the bulk of JT gravity is recovered only as an average over an ensemble of theories. An ensemble is what one writes for want of an individualâthe Hermitian operator of HilbertâPĂłlya in one case, a single microstate in the otherâand an average is a fact about the description, not about what exists. Based on this reading, and on other known connections between the primes and black holes, and between the odd zeta values and string and particle amplitudes, we propose that the obstruction in de Sitter is epistemologicalâa circumstance of mathematical circularityârather than ontologicalâa matter of vacuum selection. At this intersection the obstruction takes one form: how to describe the object without referring to the object, which the program seeks to circumvent in arithmetic and the HilbertâPĂłlya problem poses for the operator. We trace it to the non-paradoxical self-reference of binary language, in the precise sense of the Lawvere fixed-point theorem and the Yanofsky diagonal , as one of the most studied cases of self-referential circularity; and we analyse the strategies for confronting this circularity and their relation to the program for proving the Riemann hypothesisâparticularly Yuri Maninâs proposed use of the same noncommutative tori that M-theory uses, but to approach that program. From our own use of this torus we construct a string cocone, from which we later derive previously proposed criteria for holography in de Sitter, as well as the operator we propose as the microstate.